December 21, 1994
Mr. Chalmers H. Goodlin
Chairman & President
The Burnelli Company, Inc.
7372 N. W. 12th Street
Miami, Florida 33126
Dear Mr. Goodlin:
Mr. Shrontz asked me to review your recent letter of November
22, 1994 regarding the ill-treatment of Vincent Justus Burnelli
in recent Smithsonian Institution publications. In reading the
contents of your letter and reviewing the voluminous attachments
to it, I can only be awed by the enthusiasm and dedication with
which you have championed the cause of Mr. Burnelli and his ideas
for so many years.
Any historian is continually faced with the problem of deciding
what to include or exclude from a given work. While we may not
agree with the choices a particular individual has made, the prerogative
of choosing and the responsibility for those choices rests with
the author. Any good editor will, to the degree possible, honor
both the word and the intent of what the author has written, once
an item has been accepted for publication. While both author and
editor share the responsibility of avoiding publication of factual
errors or statements with malicious intent, only the author is
responsible for any omissions, perceived or real. In reviewing
the attachments to your letter, I believe you have been dealt
with fairly so far by the editor of AIR & SPACE magazine.
Mr. Boyne may be able to clarify for you his reasoning in leaving
reference to Mr. Burnelli's airplanes out of his book.
It is a peculiarity of the engineering enterprise that often
the hardware, in this case the airplanes themselves, rather than
the people who design and build them, tend to be revered by the
public at large. We generally hold the art in greater esteem than
the artist in technology. Airplanes gain fame in more-or-less
direct proportion to their military or commercial success. Unfortunately,
for what ever suite of reasons, Mr. Burnelli's designs were never
produced in sufficient number to directly influence either war
or commerce, and like many other potentially worthy candidates,
have been relegated to the status of footnotes to aviation history.
Mr. Chalmers H. Goodlin
Page 2
On a more philosophical level, the degree to which Mr. Burnelli's
concepts may have inspired or influenced other designers (consciously
or unconsciously) is likely unknowable. The great majority of
the engineers I know take exceptional pride in their work, and
most show due respect for the intellectual property of their peers.
Insofar as Mr. Burnelli's designs and concepts were based on good
basic physics and economics, it is likely that much of what has
been claimed as direct influence on others is in fact more akin
to the process in nature of "convergent evolution" (i.e.,
two or more clever individuals working from the same base of theoretical
understanding and experience on the same kind of problem arrive
at similar solutions). In nature, we thus see a dolphin resemble
in all exterior particulars a fish, when in fact it is a mammal.
Similarly, the history of aviation is filled with well documented
examples of this process (e.g. the multiple, independent inventions
of the swept wing and the turbojet engine). Since the true degree
of Mr. Burnelli's influence on other designers cannot be known,
any further contribution by me to a controversy which has existed
for more than half a century is valueless to either you or me.
Greatly privileged as we are to live in a country that cherishes
the right of every individual to hold and freely express his or
her opinions, I think you must agree that for Boeing or Mr. Shrontz
to attempt to interfere in any way with the editors of the Smithsonian
Institution Press or the author of the Smithsonian Book of Flight
would be far more unconscionable than any possible slight done
to the memory of Vincent Burnelli or his ideas by omitting them
from the book. Instead, I would suggest that, given the wide range
of publication opportunities both here and abroad, you might devote
some effort to telling the Burnelli story as you see it. History
and the public may then be the better judge than you or I regarding
the significance of Vincent Burnelli's contributions to aeronautical
technology.
Sincerely,
[signature]
R. A. Davis